University Professor Accused of Encouraging Students to Vote Dishonestly

Category: Education/Family

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. misinterpret / ˌmɪs ɪnˈtɜr prɪt / (v) – to incorrectly understand the meaning of a statement or information
    Example:

    The celebrity defended herself and claimed that the journalists misinterpreted her statement.


  2. furious / ˈfyʊər i əs / (adj) – very angry
    Example:

    Parents were furious about the school’s decision to not give food to students with lunch debt.


  3. penalize / ˈpin lˌaɪz / (v) – to give a penalty to someone
    Example:

    Students who cheated on the exam were penalized.


  4. voice / vɔɪs / (v) – to say or express something
    Example:

    Teachers voiced their concerns about their late salaries.


  5. take / teɪk / (n) – the way a person views a certain issue
    Example:

    We shared in class our different takes on the new school policy.


Article

Read the text below.

A UK professor’s social media post received negative reactions after being misinterpreted by some netizens.


In October, Carrie Paechter [KAR-ee PEECH-ter] of Nottingham Trent University posted a tweet encouraging students to register both their home and university addresses for this year’s UK general elections. Some people saw her tweet as a way to advocate election fraud by telling students to vote twice.


Because of the misunderstanding, Paechter received furious replies and was reported to the police and the Electoral Commission. Someone also wrote to her university requesting her to be penalized.


The professor was surprised by the angry reactions. She said that she already blocked more than 500 people on Twitter because of the threats she received. She defended herself, saying that she was just trying to remind students to vote. The intention of the tweet was to make sure that students were registered and informed that they could vote whether they were in their hometown or their school dorm.


Paechter claimed that she has always been careful about voicing her take on issues on social media. Despite this, she posted the tweet because she believes that keeping students informed about the elections is one of the universities’ responsibilities.


Some students were concerned about the date of last year’s elections because it fell around the universities’ end of term. During this time, most students would be traveling back home for the holiday season.


For this reason, like Paechter, educators across the country have all been exerting efforts to remind students to register both their permanent and current addresses. Some even used their lecture time to educate students about the elections and registrations.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

• Do you think it would be a good idea for Paechter to delete her tweet after it received negative reactions? Why or why not?
• Is social media a good platform for educators to raise awareness about an issue? Explain.

Discussion B

• Do you agree that universities are responsible for reminding students to register and vote? Why or why not?
• What do you think is the best way to educate students about voting? Explain.