Reese’s $25,000 promotion may violate sweepstakes laws

Category: Business

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. advocate / ˈæd və kɪt / (n.) – a person who speaks for or represents people who need help or protection
    Example:

    She is a youth advocate who helps and empowers young people to reach their full potential.


  2. attorney general / əˈtɜr ni ˈdʒɛn ər əl / (n.) – the head lawyer of a country or state who represents the government in court
    Example:

    The attorney general advises the city’s leader about legal matters.


  3. deceptive / dɪˈsɛp tɪv / (adj.) – intended to make someone believe something that’s not true
    Example:

    They use deceptive strategies to steal people’s personal information.


  4. expire / ɪkˈspaɪər / (v.) – to no longer be valid or acceptable after a period of time
    Example:

    His passport expired two months ago.


  5. lure / lʊər / (v.) – to persuade someone into doing something by offering him/her something, such as some pleasure or gain
    Example:

    Having a live music band can lure customers to go to the restaurant.


Article

Read the text below.

Reese’s may be in violation of state and federal laws with its new sweepstakes offer currently advertised on packs of peanut butter cups. The promotion on two-cup packages reads “You could win $25,000” and, in smaller print, “See details inside.” But only after consumers have bought and opened a package can they see the small print: no purchase is necessary to enter the sweepstakes.


The Reese’s contest was first reported by Edgar Dworsky, a consumer advocate and former assistant attorney general in Massachusetts, who runs the Consumer World website.


Hershey Co., the Pennsylvania candymaker that owns the Reese’s brand, didn’t immediately respond to telephone and email messages left by The Associated Press.


Sweepstakes are primarily governed by state laws, which require that no purchase is necessary to participate. A contest that requires a purchase is a lottery, which is subject to different rules.


Three federal agencies — Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Postal Service — also enforce laws governing sweepstakes depending on the medium. The Postal Service requires mailed sweepstakes offers to make clear that no purchase is necessary, for example. The FTC doesn’t govern sweepstakes specifically, but has broad laws prohibiting “unfair and deceptive acts.”


The FTC said that it can’t comment on the practices of particular companies outside of an investigation. It wouldn’t confirm or deny an investigation against Hershey.


Dworsky said a sign near Reese’s candy displays making clear that no purchase is necessary might meet legal requirements. But a spot check of candy displays in multiple states, including California, Virginia and Washington, found no such signs.


Dworsky noted that Reese’s ran a similar promotion earlier this year that ended in April using the same packaging. Some of those packages are still for sale, even though the sweepstakes code has expired, he said.


Dworsky said he’s concerned that the packaging could lure consumers into thinking they need to buy it. “You never have to pay to play. All these packages should be recalled,” he said.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Would sweepstakes offers lure you to buy a product? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • What do you think would happen if contests like sweepstakes and lottery are not regulated by the government? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • How do you think the government can make sure that brands don’t engage in deceptive advertising (ex. review ad content, invest in public awareness campaigns)? Discuss.
  • Would you still buy a product from a popular brand that has engaged in deceptive advertising? Why or why not? Discuss.