Judge denies Apple’s attempt to dismiss a class-action lawsuit over AirTag stalking

Category: Business

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. motion / ˈmoʊ ʃən / (n.) – a formal request made to a judge or court, asking for a decision or action on a specific matter
    Example:

    The lawyer made a motion to not proceed with the case due to a lack of evidence.


  2. keep tabs on (something) / kip tæbz ɒn / (idiom) – to watch or pay attention to something very closely, usually to know about its activities or locations
    Example:

    I need to keep tabs on the progress of our project to ensure we meet the deadline.


  3. inadequate / ɪnˈæd ɪ kwɪt / (adj.) – not enough or low in quantity, quality, or extent
    Example:

    The resources allocated for the project were inadequate, leading to delays in completion.


  4. deter / dɪˈtɜr / (v.) – to prevent something from happening
    Example:

    The security cameras deter potential thieves from targeting the store due to the increased risk of being caught.


  5. prolong / prəˈlɔŋ / (v.) – to make something last longer
    Example:

    The negotiations were prolonged because of disagreements between the two companies.


Article

Read the text below.

A judge has denied Apple’s motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit claiming that stalkers are using its AirTag devices to track victims—and that the tech giant hasn’t done enough to prevent them.


Apple’s $29 AirTags have become popular items since their 2021 release, helping users keep tabs on the location of anything from their lost keys to wallets and luggage. But stalkers have also taken advantage of AirTags and similar products to follow individuals without their consent.


In December 2022, Apple was sued by dozens of plaintiffs who said they were stalked by AirTag users. They alleged that Apple failed to mitigate such dangers and should have done more to protect victims—claiming AirTags “revolutionized the scope, breadth, and ease of location-based stalking” and that current safety features are inadequate.


Apple attempted to dismiss the litigation in a filing last year, arguing the company “took proactive steps to try to deter misuse” and that it should not bear liability for injuries caused by third parties. But San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed that motion on March 15.


Chhabria ruled that, while most of the class-action plaintiffs’ claims were “inadequately pled,” three can proceed for negligence and strict product liability under California law. The remaining claims were dismissed in a separate order.


Chhabria detailed arguments from both Apple and the plaintiffs in the ruling. Included were accounts from the three remaining claims of victims being stalked by former partners or others through AirTags that were allegedly attached to their cars, resulting in emotional and sometimes financial harm.


All three of these cases involve “purported defects” of AirTags that made it harder for the victims to both understand the tracking and quickly stop it, March 15’s ruling outlines, including unclear or delayed notifications, as well as an inability to disable the devices remotely, which allegedly prolonged stalking.


“Abusive and dangerous location tracking is only becoming more common, so it’s imperative to do everything we can to give voice to the victims, and to push for accountability and change,” Gillian L. Wade, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told The Associated Press via email.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • A class-action lawsuit against Apple claims that stalkers are using its AirTag devices to track victims—and that Apple hasn’t done enough to prevent them. Do you think Apple should bear responsibility for the misuse of its products? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • Should victims receive compensation from companies if their products were used to harm them? Why or why not? Who do you think should be responsible for this (ex. the user of the product, the regulators)? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • AirTags have been a helpful device but victims also claim that they “revolutionized the scope, breadth, and ease of location-based stalking.” Do you think the benefits of AirTags outweigh the potential risks associated with misuse such as stalking? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • Do you personally find the AirTag helpful? Why or why not? What aspects of your daily activities do you think you can use it for (ex. tracking my pet, keeping tabs on my things)? Discuss.