Google to purge billions of files containing personal data in settlement of Chrome privacy case

Category: Top Stories

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. purge / pɜrdʒ / (v.) – to delete or remove data that are no longer necessary
    Example:

    Make sure to purge all the photos and messages on your phone before selling it.


  2. class-action / klæs ˈæk ʃən / (adj.) – relating to legal action that’s arranged by a group of people experiencing the same problem
    Example:

    Customers united in a class-action effort to hold the tech company responsible for privacy violations.


  3. shield / ʃild / (v.) – to protect someone from any harm or danger
    Example:

    Stronger cybersecurity measures can shield businesses from cyberattacks.


  4. culminate / ˈkʌl məˌneɪt / (v.) – to reach the final result or stage of a process
    Example:

    After a lot of work, the project is culminating in success.


  5. paint a picture / peɪnt ə ˈpɪk tʃər / (idiom) – to describe or show something in a particular way
    Example:

    The newly released data painted a more accurate picture of the impact of government policies on the economy.


Article

Read the text below.

Google has agreed to purge billions of records containing personal information collected from more than 136 million people in the U.S. surfing the internet through its Chrome web browser.


The massive housecleaning comes as part of a settlement in a lawsuit accusing the search giant of illegal surveillance.


The details of the deal emerged in a court filing, more than three months after Google and the attorneys handling the class-action case disclosed they had resolved a June 2020 lawsuit targeting Chrome’s privacy controls.


Among other allegations, the lawsuit accused Google of tracking Chrome users’ internet activity even when they had switched the browser to the “Incognito” setting that is supposed to shield them from being shadowed by the Mountain View, California, company. 


Google vigorously fought the lawsuit until U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected a request to dismiss the case last August, setting up a potential trial. The settlement was negotiated during the next months, culminating in disclosure of the terms, which Rogers still must approve during a hearing scheduled for July 30 in Oakland, California, federal court.


The settlement requires Google to expunge billions of personal records stored in its data centers and make more prominent privacy disclosures about Chrome’s Incognito option when it is activated. It also imposes other controls designed to limit Google’s collection of personal information.


“We are pleased to settle this lawsuit, which we always believed was meritless,” Google said. The company asserted it is only being required to “delete old personal technical data that was never associated with an individual and was never used for any form of personalization.”


In court papers, the attorneys representing Chrome users painted a much different picture, depicting the settlement as a major victory for personal privacy in an age of ever-increasing digital surveillance.


The lawyers valued the settlement at $4.75 billion to $7.8 billion, relying on calculations based primarily on the potential ad sales that the personal information collected through Chrome could have generated in the past and future without the new restrictions.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Would you continue using a company’s products/services if you discovered that it’s making money from your personal information? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • What specific practices or behaviors do you seek from companies to ensure they prioritize user privacy and consent (ex. prioritizing data security measures, allowing me to control what data is collected about me and how it’s used)? Do you know any company that does this? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Is it important for you that web browsers have “Incognito” mode or settings? Why or why not? In what situations do you think people should use the “Incognito” mode (ex. when using a public or shared computer, when conducting sensitive online research)? Discuss.
  • Do you think it’s possible to ensure personal privacy despite the widespread digital surveillance, or do you think we’ll inevitably sacrifice privacy for technological progress? Discuss.