US senators call out Big Tech’s new approach to poaching talent, products from smaller AI startups

Category: Technology/Innovations

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. poaching / ˈpoʊ tʃɪŋ / (n.) – the act of persuading someone who works for another person to work for one’s own company or business
    Example:

    The company was criticized for poaching employees instead of investing in training its own staff.


  2. bypass / ˈbaɪˌpæs / (v.) – to ignore a rule, system, or an official authority
    Example:

    He used a fake ID to bypass the age restrictions at the club.


  3. outright / ˈaʊtˈraɪt / (adv.) – completely or entirely
    Example:

    They decided it was easier to buy the software company outright rather than partner with it.


  4. trove / troʊv / (n.) – a large amount of something that’s useful or valuable
    Example:

    The charity received a trove of donations from generous sponsors.


  5. guardrail / ˈgɑrdˌreɪl / (n.) – a rule or standard established to protect a person or an organization from any harm
    Example:

    Guardrails in project management help keep the project on track and within budget.


Article

Read the text below.

In the race to stay ahead in artificial intelligence, the biggest technology companies are swallowing up the talent and products of innovative AI startups without formally acquiring them.


Now three members of the U.S. Senate are calling for an investigation.


San Francisco-based Adept announced a deal that will send its CEO and key employees to Amazon and give the e-commerce giant a license to Adept’s AI systems and datasets.


Some call it a “reverse acquihire.” Others call it poaching. Whatever it’s called, it’s alarming to some in Washington who see it as an attempt to bypass U.S. laws that protect against monopolies.


“To acquire only some employees or the majority, but not all license technology, leave the company functioning but not really competing, that’s a new twist,” Michael A. Cusumano, a business professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said.


“What is going on here is instead of buying startups outright, big tech companies are trying a new play,” U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden said in an interview. “They don’t want to formally acquire the companies, avoiding the antitrust scrutiny. I think that’s going to be the playbook until the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) really starts digging into these deals.” 


For smaller AI startups, the problem is also that building AI systems is expensive, requiring costly computer chips, power-hungry data centers, huge troves of data to train upon, and highly skilled computer scientists.


“They may have made a decision that they have no real future and just don’t have deep enough pockets to compete in this space, so they probably prefer to be acquired outright,” Cusumano said.


Wyden has long taken an interest in technology, helping to write the 1996 law that helped set the ground rules for free speech on the internet. He said he generally favors a straightforward approach that encourages innovation, with guardrails as needed.


But in the AI industry, he said, “companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, either own major parts of the AI ecosystem or they have a leg up thanks to their massive resources.”


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • What are your thoughts on the concept of “reverse acquihire” in which companies gain access to talent and technology without formally acquiring the startup (ex. it’s alarming, it’s beneficial)? Why do you say so? Discuss.
  • If you were the CEO of a startup, how would you feel about entering a “reverse acquihire” deal with a larger company? What factors would influence your decision ( ex. potential for growth, job security for employees)? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Considering that big companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google own major parts of the AI ecosystem, do you think this concentration of power is beneficial or harmful for the AI industry? How do you say so? Discuss.
  • Do you think maintaining competition among tech companies is crucial for the AI industry? Why or why not? Discuss.