White House says no need to restrict “open-source” artificial intelligence—at least for now

Category: Technology/Innovations

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. delve into (something) / dɛlv ˈɪn tu / (phrasal v.) – to examine or study something carefully to find out more information
    Example:

    The scientist decided to delve into the research data to find patterns that could explain the experiment’s results.


  2. misuse / mɪsˈyus / (n.) – the act of using something in a way that is incorrect, illegal, or not as intended
    Example:

    The tech company created new security measures to prevent the misuse of their online platform.


  3. warrant / ˈwɔr ənt / (v.) – to need or require something
    Example:

    The manager doesn’t think the employee’s minor mistake warrants a punishment.


  4. heightened / ˈhaɪ tnd / (adj.) – stronger or more intense than usual
    Example:

    The company experienced heightened demand for its products during the holiday season, leading to an increase in sales.


  5. entrench / ɛnˈtrɛntʃ / (v.) – to firmly establish or set something, such as an idea or a position, in a way that cannot easily be changed
    Example:

    The new policy entrenches the company’s commitment to sustainable practices.


Article

Read the text below.

The White House is coming out in favor of “open-source” artificial intelligence (AI) technology, arguing in a report that there’s no need right now for restrictions on companies making key components of their powerful AI systems widely available.


“We recognize the importance of open systems,” said Alan Davidson, an assistant secretary of the U.S. Commerce Department, in an interview with The Associated Press.


As part of a sweeping executive order on AI last year, President Joe Biden gave the U.S. Commerce Department until July to talk to experts and come back with recommendations on how to manage the potential benefits and risks of so-called open models.


The report is the U.S. government’s first to delve into a tech industry debate between developers such as ChatGPT-maker OpenAI who advocates closing off their models’ inner workings to guard against misuse, and others, such as Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who has lobbied for a more open approach they say favors innovation.


“A year ago, there was a strong narrative about risk and long-term concerns about AI systems being too powerful,” said Davidson, administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). “We continue to have concerns about AI safety, but this report reflects a more balanced view that shows that there are real benefits in the openness of these technologies.”


The NTIA’s report says “current evidence is not sufficient” to warrant restrictions on AI models with “widely available weights.” Weights are numerical values that influence how an AI model performs. But it also says U.S. officials must continue to monitor potential dangers and “take steps to ensure that the government is prepared to act if heightened risks emerge.”


Though set in motion last fall, the report comes at a time when AI policies are now a subject of U.S. election politics in the presidential race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.


Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, has previously voiced strong support for open-source AI, warning that CEOs of big technology companies are pushing for regulations that could entrench their incumbent positions.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The White House favors open-source AI technology. Additionally, NTIA’s report says “current evidence is not sufficient” to warrant restrictions on AI models. What do you think about open-source AI technology (ex. it’s dangerous, it’s beneficial)? Do you agree with the White House’s decision not to restrict open-source AI models? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • Some tech developers believe closing off AI models can prevent misuse, while others argue openness promotes innovation. Which do you think is more important: preventing misuse of AI or promoting innovation? Why? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Why do you think tech developers are divided when it comes to the issue of openness in AI tech? What are some reasons why a company might want to close off its systems (ex. it doesn’t want to share its ideas with other businesses, it is genuinely concerned about safety)? What are some reasons why a company might support open systems (ex. it allows them to get innovative ideas from others, it promotes fairness in business)? Discuss.
  • What could be the benefits or problems of having big tech leaders make a huge influence on important decisions such as regulations? Who do you think should have the biggest influence on making decisions about such matters (ex. citizens, human rights advocates)? Why? Discuss.