Australian states back national plan to ban children younger than 16 from social media

Category: Top Stories

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. uniformity / ˌyu nəˈfɔr mɪ ti / (n.) – the quality or characteristic of being the same
    Example:

    Uniformity in processes helps the staff members work smoothly with each other.


  2. take effect / teɪk ɪˈfɛkt / (idiom) – to start working as required by law or regulation
    Example:

    The policy will take effect once the president signs it tomorrow.


  3. in principle / ɪn ˈprɪn sə pəl / (idiom) – in general terms and without particular attention to detail
    Example:

    The proposal was accepted in principle, but several changes need to be made before it’s finalized.


  4. blunt / blʌnt / (adj.) – not sharp and so unable to do things well
    Example:

    The factory workers are throwing away old and blunt tools as these won’t help them at work.


  5. tech-savvy / ˈtɛkˌsæv i / (adj.) – having a lot of knowledge about modern technology, especially computers
    Example:

    My company is looking for tech-savvy employees to help improve our digital system.


Article

Read the text below.

Australia’s states and territories unanimously backed a national plan to require most forms of social media to bar children younger than 16.


Leaders of the eight provinces held a virtual meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to discuss what he calls a world-first national approach that would make platforms including X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook responsible for enforcing the age limit.


“Social media is doing social harm to our young Australians,” Albanese told reporters. “The safety and mental health of our young people has to be a priority.”


The government leaders had been discussing for months setting a limit, considering options from 14 to 16 years of age.


While Tasmania would have preferred 14, the state was prepared to support 16 in the interests of achieving national uniformity, Albanese said.


The legislation was introduced into Parliament, and the age ban will take effect a year after it passes into law, giving platforms time to work out how to exclude children. The government has yet to offer a technical solution.


The delay is also intended to allow time to address privacy concerns around age verification.


The main opposition party has given in principle support to the 16-year age limit since it was announced, suggesting the legislation will pass the Senate.


More than 140 academics with expertise in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last October opposing a social media age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”


Critics say most teenagers are tech-savvy enough to get around such laws. Some fear the ban will create conflicts within families and drive social media problems underground.


Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, argues that stronger tools in app stores and operating systems for parents to control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Australia is banning the use of social media among young people to ensure safety. Do you think an age limit on social media is enough to keep young people safe? Why or why not? In your country, would an age limit on social media help or cause more problems? Why do you say so? Discuss.
  • Aside from a ban or age limit, how else can the government make social media safer for young users? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Albanese said, “Social media is doing social harm to our young Australians.” What do you think his statement meant? Do you agree that social media is doing social harm to the youth? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • More than 140 academics in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese opposing a social media age limit. Why do you think these experts oppose the ban? If a ban like this were proposed in your country, would you agree or disagree with it? Why? Discuss.