What billionaires and their advisers say keeps them from giving more and faster

Category: Lifestyle/Entertainment

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. deliberate / dɪˈlɪb əˌreɪt / (v.) – to think or talk carefully about something before making a decision
    Example:

    After deliberating for hours, the group decided to increase the budget for the new project.


  2. cumulative / ˈkyu myə lə tɪv / (adj.) – increasing or growing as a result of combining multiple actions, efforts, or results over time
    Example:

    The cumulative damage from years of pollution has harmed the environment in this area.


  3. convene / kənˈvin / (v.) – to bring people together for a meeting or activity
    Example:

    The committee convenes twice a month to review project progress.


  4. cohort / ˈkoʊ hɔrt / (n.) – a group of people who share something in common, like age, interests, or experience
    Example:

    During the study, participants were organized in cohorts based on their age to compare the results effectively.


  5. anonymity / ˌæn əˈnɪm ɪ ti / (n.) – the state of being unknown or not revealing someone's identity
    Example:

    Many people feel more comfortable expressing opinions online because of anonymity.


Article

Read the text below.

America’s wealthiest people have urged each other to give away more of their money since at least 1889, the year Andrew Carnegie argued that the richest should give away their fortunes within their lifetimes, in part to lessen the sting of growing inequality.


So, what stands in the way of the wealthiest people giving more and giving faster?


Philanthropy advisers say some answers are structural, like finding the right vehicles and advisers, and some have to do with emotional and psychological factors, like negotiating with family members or wanting to look good in the eyes of their peers.


Piyush Tantia, chief innovation officer at ideas42, points out that unlike everyday donors, who may give in response to an ask from a friend or family member, the wealthiest donors end up deliberating much more about where to give.


His advice is to think about philanthropy as a portfolio, with different risk levels and strategies ideally working in concert. That way it’s less about the outcome of any single grant and more about the cumulative impact.


Private and open conversations between donors also help them move forward, advisers have found. The Center for High Impact Philanthropy runs an academy that convenes very wealthy donors, their advisers, and the heads of foundations to learn together in cohorts.


But executive director Kat Rosqueta said, that sometimes donors struggle with seeing how to make a difference, given that philanthropic funding is tiny compared to government spending or the business sector.


Cara Bradley, deputy director at the Gates Foundation, said the scrutiny of billionaire philanthropy also means they feel a huge responsibility to use their funds as best as possible.


Deborah Small, a marketing professor at Yale School of Management, said, in general, current social norms value anonymity in giving, which is seen as being more virtuous because the donor isn’t recognized for their generosity.


“It would be better for causes, and for philanthropy as a whole, if everybody was open about it because that would create the social norm that this is an expectation in society,” she said.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Andrew Carnegie argued that the richest should give away their fortunes within their lifetimes to lessen the sting of growing inequality. In your opinion, is it the rich’s responsibility to give away a certain percentage of their wealth and relieve inequality? Why do you think so? Who do you think society should expect to give (ex. everyone, only the billionaires)? Why? Discuss.
  • Do you believe it’s reasonable for the wealthiest people to take more time deciding where to donate? Why or why not? If you were extremely wealthy, how would you decide where to give? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Current social norms value anonymity in giving, however, being open about giving would benefit causes and philanthropy by making generosity a social expectation. How would you feel if you heard someone talk about their donations? In your opinion, should billionaires be open about their donations, or is it better to stay anonymous? Why? How can transparency improve the effectiveness of charitable donations? Discuss.
  • Do you agree that people should talk about their giving so it becomes a norm that is expected in society? Why or why not? How can making giving an expectation in society encourage more donations? Do you see this happening in the future? Why so? Discuss.